Convened By
\nMax Baldia (USA), Tim Perttula (USA) and Douglas Frink (USA)<\/p>\n
Theme Details
\nEnvironmental issues have long been one of the preeminent components of archaeology. Where people live, what they eat, what they harvest, procure, or utilize – all these things and more are determined or influenced by the opportunities, challenges, and constraints of their immediate environment. At the same time, how people interact with the environment is channeled, controlled, or otherwise influenced by social political, demographic factors. Archaeologists and their colleagues in other disciplines have worked not only to investigate these relationships, but to track how they changed over thousands of years.<\/p>\n
Today we have a broad range of analytical tools and interpretive models to illuminate the workings of prehistoric human ecosystems. Among the techniques employed, detailed faunal studies may reveal not only the species of shellfish recovered at a site, but the season when they were harvested. The tree rings present in wooden beams from structures can be correlated with climatic shifts, and also provide an absolute date for the structure in question. And shifts in settlement and subsistence patterns can be related to changes in forest\/grasslands boundaries, exploitation strategies, and environmental influences.<\/p>\n
Of course, an archaeology focused on environmental issues underrepresents the social and intellectual realms, and often substantially so. This is exacerbated by the fact that not all elements of the human experience preserve equally or at all in the archaeological record – stones, pottery, and bones are more durable and recognizable than those often subtle features of material culture that reflect kinship or gender roles. Contemporary archaeologists have generally moved far from the environmental determinism of the past decades in any case, and our understanding of the natural, social and other dimensions of past human societies has increased through greater awareness of the issues. In addition, our perspectives of human-environmental relations has increased substantially not only by developing more critical perspectives, but also by working with Indigenous peoples who themselves are becoming more involved in archaeology worldwide.<\/p>\n
Our frame of reference concerning the environmental dimension in archaeology continues to shift as well. Long dominated by hard science approaches (e.g., oxygen isotopic studies; palynology), the field has broadened appreciably by concerns for, and interest in, the more human elements (e.g., influence of worldview on environmental relations; employment of traditional knowledge in resource harvesting and management). This follows similar trends in the broader field of anthropology.
\nThe starting point for this theme then is that not only are human-environmental relations highly dynamic, but so too is the way that we study and interpret those relations. Moving from the fundamental basis of analysis through to an heuristic appreciation of the inherent mechanisms operating within human-environment interactions is an essential aspect of current research methodologies. In recognition of this, we identify two complementary dimensions of this theme. The first examines past human-environmental interactions from the perspective of “modern” science, and the second from that of “ancient” science (i.e., traditional or Indigenous knowledge). The interface that exists between them is likely to be a particularly important and productive source of intellectual tension and methodological challenges.<\/p>\n
Please visit the Comparative Archaeology website for more information:
\nhttp:\/\/www.comp-archaeology.org\/WAC5Abstracts2001EnvironmentSocialResponse.htm
\nContact:
\nDouglas Frink
\nArchaeology Consulting Team
\n57 River Road, Suite 1020
\nEssex, VT 05452
\nUSA
\nEmail: DSFrink@aol.com<\/p>\n
Dr. Maximilian O. Baldia,
\nThe Comparative Archaeology WEB
\n3616 Dinsmore Castle Dr.
\nColumbus, OH 43221-4410
\nUSA
\nEmail: CompArchaeologyWEB@columbus.rr.com<\/p>\n
Dr. Timothy K. Perttula
\nArcheological and Environmental Consultants
\nAustin, Texas
\nUSA
\nEmail: TKP4747@aol.com<\/p>\n
Potential Session Topics<\/p>\n
Reconstructing Ancient Landscapes: GIS and Beyond
\nInterpreting Past Human-Environment Interaction
\nThe Social Dimensions of Wetland and Other Environments
\nAnthropomorphic Influences on Landscape Development
\nIssues of Scale in Prehistoric Human Ecology
\nIndigenous Perspectives in Environmental Archaeology
\nApplications of Archaeological Knowledge to Modern Environmental Problems<\/p>\n
Organized By
\nJim Cassidy (USA), Michael A. Glassow (USA)and Nina A. Kononenko (Russia)<\/p>\n
Session Details
\nContact:
\nJim Cassidy,
\nDepartment of Anthropology,
\nUniversity of California Santa Barbara
\ne-mail: jdc2@umail.ucsb.edu<\/p>\n
Michael A. Glassow,
\nDepartment of Anthropology,
\nUniversity of California Santa Barbara
\ne-mail: glassow@anth.ucsb.edu<\/p>\n
Nina A. Kononenko,
\nInstitute of History,Archaeology and Ethnology of the peoples of the Far East,
\nRussian Academy of Sciences, Far Eastern Branch.
\ne-mail: kononenkonina@hotmail.com<\/p>\n
Human populations have occupied coastal regions of the north Pacific Rim since the Late Pleistocene, and archaeology has revealed that prehistoric coast-dwelling populations exploited a broad range of terrestrial, riverine, lagoonal, estuarine, and marine resources. For the purpose of this symposium, the north Pacific Rim is defined as extending from southeastern Korea, north to the Bering Strait, and then south to the southern boundary of California. In regions of the north Pacific Rim with long records of occupation, it is evident that prehistoric coast-dwelling peoples responded to many different kinds of environmental change, including those caused by such factors as climatic fluctuation, sea level rise, changes in water salinity, and infilling of lagoons and estuaries. As well, human population growth, expansion, and competition affected ecological relationships. Papers presented in this symposium concern three principal topics: archaeological evidence of past coastal environments and environmental change, human response to environmental change, and the manner in which prehistoric cultures adjusted to new environments as populations expanded into new territories.
\nPresentations
\nEarly Maritime Cultures In The North Pacific Region
\nRobert E. Ackerman (Department of Anthropology, Washington State University , USA) Human Response to Environmental Change on the Coast of British Columbia.
\nRoy L. Carlson (Department of Archaeology, Simon Fraser University, Canada)
\nCorrelations Of Climate And Culture Change In The Primorye Of The Russian Far East During The Formation Of Proposed Bronze Age Cultural Complexes.
\nJim Cassidy (Department of Anthropology, University of California Santa Barbara, USA) Variation in Coastal Adaptation During the Middle Holocene Prehistory of the Santa Barbara Channel, California
\nMichael A. Glassow (Department of Anthropology, University of California Santa Barbara, USA)
\nThe Japanese Archipelago Towards The End Of The Pleistocene
\nFumiko Ikawa-Smith (Department of Anthropology, McGill University, Canada) On the Earliest Evidence of Marine Resource Exploitation in the Russian Far East.
\nNina A. Kononenko (Institute of History, Archaeology and Ethnology of the peoples of the Far East, Russian Academy of Sciences, Far Eastern Branch)
\nCultural And Environmental Change In Coastal Korea
\nSarah M. Nelson (Department of Anthropology, University of Denver, USA) Environmental Changes and Migrations: Case of Study
\nYuri E. Vostretsov (Institute of History, Archaeology and Ethnology of the peoples of the Far East, Russian Academy of Sciences, Far Eastern Branch)
\nPaleoecology Of The Boisman Culture In North Pacific Perspective
\nDavid R. Yesner (University of Alaska Anchorage, Canada) and Alexander N. Popov (Museum, Far Eastern State University) Complex Hunter-Gatherer-Fisher Peoples in Coastal California: A Critical Examination of Resource Intensification
\nKent G. Lightfoot (Archaeological Research Facility, Department of Anthropology, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA)<\/p>\n
Session Time
\nDay Wednesday Date 25th June
\nTime 9AM-1PM Room Caldwell 109<\/p>\n
Organized By
\nMax Baldia (USA), Timothy Perttula (USA) and Douglas Frink (USA)<\/p>\n
Session Details
\nOrganized by
\nMaximilian O. Baldia, Research Associate
\nInstitute for the Study of Earth and Man, Southern Methodist University, Dallas, TX, USA
\nEditor, The Comparative Archaeology WEB
\nDirector\/Principal Investigator, Czech-American Research Program<\/p>\n
Timothy K. Perttula, Director\/Principal Investigator
\nArcheological and Environmental Consultants, Austin, TX, USA<\/p>\n
Douglas S. Frink, Director\/Principal Investigator
\nArchaeology Consulting Team, Essex Junction, VT, USA
\nArchaeological excavations throughout the world and at all time periods show surprising but strong correlations between climatic oscillations and the character of social and cultural responses by different human populations. They confirm humanity’s battle with (and impact on) the environment. In some cases, adjustments are a principal cause for social and technological innovations. Innovations include plant and animal domestication, as well as the punctuated spread and adoption of agriculture, the first use of wheeled vehicles, the construction of large earthen and stone monuments, and perhaps the advent of metallurgy. In other cases, an outright collapse of cultural systems is indicated. Signs of collapse traced to climatic oscillations include religious and social upheavals, warfare, genocide, site abandonment, and population migration. This session aims to examine the range of sociocultural responses to climatic stress and specific climate forcing variables that may account for the observed climate record. Tree-ring data, lake level and glacial fluctuations, ice core data, pollen analysis, physical anthropology research, and other pertinent data will be used for high quality reconstructions of climatic and human history in different parts of the New and Old World. This history will be used in conjunction with changes in settlement and procurement strategies, human physical and dietary changes, technological innovations, as well as stylistic and symbolic convergence, to measure sociocultural responses to and impact on climate change, reflected in archaeological data from nomadic hunter-gatherers, proto-horticulturalists, sedentary agriculturists, to early urbanized societies.
\nPresentations
\nThe Poverty Of The Settlement Abandonment Concept In Archaeology: Ancestral Pueblo Landscape Use In The American Southwest
\nMichael Adler (Anthropology Department, Southern Methodist University, Dallas, Texas, USA) Breaking the Agricultural Barrier: Paleoclimate and the Funnel Beaker Culture
\nMaximilian O. Baldia (Research Associate, Institute for the Study of Earth and Man, Southern Methodist University, Dallas, Texas, USA)
\nDistribution Pattern Of The Settlement Sites With Menhirs In SW Atlantic Europe And The Inference Of The Socio-economic Organization Of Their Builders
\nDavid Calado (IPPAR. Instituto Portugu\u00eas do Patrim\u00f3nio Arquitect\u00f3nico, State Department for Cultural Affairs, Portugal) Late Holocene Climatic Change and Human Responses at Southern Patagonia: A Geoarchaeological view
\nCristian M. Favier Dubois (CONICET\/Departamento de Arqueolog\u00eda, Universidad Nacional del Centro, Olavarr\u00eda, Prov. de Buenos Aires. Argentina)
\nTransforming Linear Limits Into Dynamic Solutions: Changes In Environmental Constraints And Cultural Adaptations
\nDouglas Frink (Director\/Principal Investigator, Archaeology Consulting Team, Inc., Essex Junction, VT, USA) Taphonomic processes affecting monumental earthen architecture as a proxy for climatic change
\nDouglas Frink (Director\/Principal Investigator, Archaeology Consulting Team, Inc., Essex Junction, VT, USA)
\nSprucing Up The House: An Interdisciplinary Investigation Of An 18th Century Communal House In Northern Labrador
\nSusan Kaplan (Director of Peary-Macmillan Arctic Museum & Arctic Studies Center, Sociology & Anthropology Dept., Bowdoin College, Brunswick, USA), Jim Woollett, Rosanne D\u00edArrigo, Brendan Buckley, Allison Bain, and Cynthia Zutter Society and Ecology during the Middle Bronze Age of Southern Scandinavia.
\nLars Larsson (Arkeologi, University of Lund, Lund, Sweden)
\nIt Got Cold And They Died? Climate And The End Of Norse Greenland
\nThomas H. McGovern (Northern Science & Education Center, Anthropology Dept, Hunter College CUNY, New York, USA) Nomadic Agriculturalists in Wetland Mediterranean Archaeology: Papa Uvas (Aljaraque, Huelva, Spain) in its Context
\nAgust\u00edn M\u00aa Lucena Mart\u00edn (\u00c1rea de Prehistoria, Facultad de Filosof\u00eda y Letras, Plaza del Cardenal Salazar, C\u00f3rdoba, Spain)
\nCultural Response To Environmental Change In The Alps: Seeking Continuity In The Bronze Age Lake-Dwelling Tradition
\nFrancesco Menotti (Institute of Archaeology, 36 Beaumont Street, Oxford, England) Marshland of Cities: Deltaic Landscapes and the Evolution of Early Mesopotamian Civilization
\nJennifer R. Pournelle (UCSD Dept. of Anthropology, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA , USA)
\nPopulation Movements And The Archaeological Record
\nDean R. Snow (Department of Anthropology, The Pennsylvania State University, 409 Carpenter Building, University Park, PA, USA) The Mesolithic\/Neolithic transition in the Carpathian Basin: Was there anecological trap during the Neolithic Age?
\nP\u00e1l S\u00fcmegi (University of Szeged, Department of Geology and Paleontology, 6722 Szeged Egyetem u.2., Hungary), R\u00f3bert Kert\u00e9sz, Imola Juh\u00e1sz, G\u00e1bor, T\u00edm\u00e1r-S\u00e1ndor Guly\u00e1s
\nEarly Prehistoric Migration As Sociocultural Response To A Changing World
\nOlena V. Smyntyna (Department of Archaeology and Ethnology of Ukraine, Mechnikov National University, Odessa I.I., Ukraine) From Hunter-Gatherer to Livestock-Keeper: Economic Change in Northeastern and Southwestern Africa
\nRalf Vogelsang (Universit\u00e4t zu K\u00f6ln, Forschungsstelle Afrika, Jennerstr. 8, 50823 K\u00f6ln)
\nDangerous Regions: A Source Of Cascading Cultural Changes
\nJoel Gunn (New South Associates, Inc., Mebane, North Carolina, USA) Redefining the Shashe-Limpopo Landscape: An Archaeological Perspective
\nMunyaradzi Manyanga (University of Botswana, Archaeology Unit, Botswana)
\nClimatic Change And 3rd Millennium BCE Collapse: A View From The Mesopotamian Delta
\nJennifer R. Pournelle (UCSD Dept. of Anthropology, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA , USA) GIS Study of Settlement Structure in Response to Climatic Change During the TRB: Moravia, Czech Republic
\nMatthew Boulanger (Archaeology Consulting Team, Inc., Essex Junction, VT 05452, USA)
\nUnionidae As A Potential Food Source For A Late Neolithic Community From H\u00f3dmez\u00f5v\u00e1s\u00e1rhely-Gorzsa, Hungary
\nS\u00e1ndor Guly\u00e1s (University of Szeged, Department of Geology and Paleontology, 6722 Szeged Egyetem u.2., Hungary), Anik\u00f3 T\u00f3th (University of Szeged, Department of Geology and Paleontology, 6722 Szeged Egyetem u.2., Hungary), P\u00e1l S\u00fcmegi (Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Institute of Archeology, H 1014 Budapest, \u00dari u.49. Hungary) Late Neolithic man and environment in the Carpathian Basin- a preliminary geoarcheological report from Cs_szhalom at Tiszapolg\u00e1r
\nP\u00e1l S\u00fcmegi, S\u00e1ndor Guly\u00e1s, Zolt\u00e1n Hunyadfalvi, S\u00e1ndor Moln\u00e1r, Katalin Herbich, Mariann Imre, Gabriella Szegv\u00e1ri (University of Szeged, Department of Geology and Paleontology, 6722 Szeged Egyetem u.2., Hungary) and Imola Juh\u00e1sz (Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Institute of Archeology, H-1014 Budapest \u00dari u.49, Hungary)<\/p>\n
Session Time
\nDay Sunday & Monday Date 22nd & 23rd June
\nTime 9AM-1PM & 4-6PM (Sun Room Caldwell 109<\/p>\n
Organized By
\nRoland Fletcher (Australia)<\/p>\n
Session Details
\nLarge low-density urban complexes were a feature of tropical regions in the Old and the New world through the first fifteen hundred years of the Common Era. The similarities in the overall form and milieu of these settlements were noted many years ago by Coe and Bronson, among others. The ecological conditions of human impact in the tropic are also a current topic of some concern suggesting that the analysis of past settlement patterns and their history may help to reveal the fragilities and the strength of tropical environments. The issue is of broad significance because by the time of the European expansion the low density, dispersed type of urban settlement had largely been replaced by small compact urban settlements. The demise of the low density cities of the Maya in Yucatan (e.g. Tikal) and of the Khmer in SE Asia (e.g. Angkor) has been ascribed to ecological disaster though there are competing opinions. What led to their demise is therefore of some general relevance. The purpose of the session is to establish a dialogue between archaeologists, historians and environmental researchers to try and ascertain what may have happened and why the overall form of the low-density cities of Mesoamerica and SE Asia came to look quite similar.<\/p>\n
A broader aim of the session is to bring together researchers and members of the public interested in the characteristics of pre-industrial low-density urbanism in the tropics and its long term ecological viability. The session may also be relevant to researchers in Amazonia and West Africa who are very welcome to participate, as is anyone who is concerned with the general issues of the session.<\/p>\n
The emphasis of the session will be on:
\n* New analytical and interpretive methods to reconstruct ancient human landscapes, such as GIS modeling.
\n* Identification, interpretation, or evaluation of proposed past human-environment interactions, and specifically the relationship between human-induced and natural environmental changes.
\n* Anthropomorphic influences on landscape development, associated with both small-scale and large-scale societies.
\n* Reconstructing past landscapes and visualising urban form.
\n* Applications of archaeological knowledge to modern environmental problems.
\n* Comparative urban analysis including the nature and role of social theory in archaeology.
\nPresentations
\nThe Nature Of Low Density Dispersed Urbanism: A Global View
\nRoland Fletcher (University of Sydney, NSW, Australia) Palaeoenvironmental Research and the Demise of Angkor.
\nDr Dan Penny (University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia)
\nOf Heterarchy, Urbanism, And The Maya
\nEleanor M. King (Howard University, Washington, D.C. U.S.A) The Khmer Empire\u2019s Impact on the Present-Day Forest of Cambodia.
\nDr Heng Thung (Asheville, North Carolina, USA)
\nLaterally Urban, But Just As Dense: Exploding Some Myths About Maya Cities
\nElizabeth Graham (University College London, London, UK) The Historical Water Management of Angkor, Cambodia
\nMr Matti Kummu (Helsinki University of Technology, Helsinki, Finland)
\nAngkorean Roads Near Phimai And The Hydrological System Of Sukhothai: Remote Sensing And GIS For Archaeological Applications In Thailand
\nSurat Lertlum Chulachomklao (Royal Military Academy (CRMA), Asian Institute of Technology (AIT), Thailand) Ritual Technology and Resource Management in Tropical States
\nJulie L. Kunen (Georgetown University and Smithsonian Institution, Washington DC, USA)
\nClassic Angkor And Classic Maya Revisited
\nMichael D. Coe (Yale University, Connecticut, USA) Scale, Structure and the Demise of the ‘Hydraulic City’ at Angkor
\nDamian Evans (Archaeological Computing Laboratory, Spatial Science Innovation Unit, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia) and Roland Fletcher
\nReviving Ancient Water Management Practices In Mesoamerica
\nBarbara W. Fash (Peabody Museum, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA) with Karla Davis-Salazar, and William Fash III Ancient Environmental Impact: The Consequences of Incipient Maya Occupation in the Mirador Basin of Northern Guatemala
\nRichard D. Hansen (Institute of Geophysics, University of California, Los Angeles, USA and Foundation for Anthropological Research & Environmental Studies (FARES))
\nAngkor And Beyond ….
\nChristophe Pottier (French Institute of East Asian Studies (EFEO), Researcher, Ph. D., Architect DPLG)<\/p>\n
Session Time
\nDay Thursday Date 26th June
\nTime 9AM-1PM Room Caldwell 109<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Convened By Max Baldia (USA), Tim Perttula (USA) and Douglas Frink (USA) Theme Details Environmental issues have long been one of the preeminent components of archaeology. Where people live, what they eat, what they harvest, procure, or utilize – all these things and more are determined or influenced by the opportunities, challenges, and constraints of … Read more<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":2159,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","template":"","meta":{"ngg_post_thumbnail":0,"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-2202","page","type-page","status-publish"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/worldarchaeologicalcongress.com\/wac5\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/2202","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/worldarchaeologicalcongress.com\/wac5\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/worldarchaeologicalcongress.com\/wac5\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/worldarchaeologicalcongress.com\/wac5\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/worldarchaeologicalcongress.com\/wac5\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2202"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/worldarchaeologicalcongress.com\/wac5\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/2202\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2788,"href":"https:\/\/worldarchaeologicalcongress.com\/wac5\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/2202\/revisions\/2788"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/worldarchaeologicalcongress.com\/wac5\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/2159"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/worldarchaeologicalcongress.com\/wac5\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2202"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}